The Ethics Institute of Utrecht University’s Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies seeks a researcher for a 3-year, full-time postdoctoral project “
Mutual Justification and Disruptive Technology”, as part of the inter-university Gravitation consortium
Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technology (ESDiT).
Your job We are looking for a philosopher with expertise in normative ethics, metaethics, or methodologies of applied ethics who is interested in pursuing independent research and other activities related to the following project, based at Utrecht University, as part of the multi-university research consortium, "Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies".
A key part of what makes the emergence of new technologies particularly disruptive is the moral disorientation and uncertainty that they often produce. Socially disruptive technologies can challenge the applicability of established principles to changed circumstances, the foreseeability of future consequences, and even the viability of key ethical concepts, leading to uncertainty, instability, and ambiguity about ethical judgments and intuitions.
Circumstances of moral disorientation pose special difficulties for what is, arguably, a key feature of ethics: the aim of
mutually justifying our judgments, policies, and actions to one another. Many leading ethical theories – such as contractualism, Kantian constructivism, or discourse ethics – conceptualise ethical justification in terms of the obligation, roughly speaking, to provide reasons on which agreement can be reached. This important focus on mutual justification becomes especially vexed, however, when previously shared intuitions are unsettled and common points of reference disappear. As a result, ethical theories focused on mutual justification face profound challenges when technologies disrupt, for example, our understanding of concepts such as “personhood” or “participant in ethical discourse.” By way of illustration: What justifications do we owe each other when one of us is an AI? How can we appeal to principles of solidarity if everyone’s health prognosis can be predicted precisely? How can we apply the discourse-ethical principle of “the approval of all affected” within the domain of virtual realities?
Ethicists of technology have extensive experience analyzing such situations of uncertainty, indeterminacy, disorientation, and unforeseeable change. Their approaches frequently emphasise contextual, empirical, and engaged perspectives and focus on developing pragmatic procedures for restoring mutually agreed upon basis for social cooperation, with an emphasis on socially responsive policy, stakeholder engagement, and ethics by design. At the same time, these pragmatic, procedural approaches to restoring moral orientation or building consensus regarding contested issues regularly give rise to questions about the extent to which the resulting
de facto agreements represent instances of genuine justification.
The central aim of this project is to examine the potential for selected philosophical approaches taken from these two broad traditions to learn from each other, particularly in addressing the following questions, broadly construed: How can we best understand the obligation to mutually justify our responses to socially disruptive technologies and the
moral dynamism, moral uncertainty, and
moral disorientation associated with them? And, more generally, how can we come up with robust moral justifications if morality is subject to change? The postdoc will pursue independent research that engages these topics in a way that supports the research objectives of the ESDiT consortium. More information about the project can be found on
this SurfDrive link.
This postdoctoral position will be part of the
Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies programme, a ten-year-long international research programme of seven academic institutions in the Netherlands that started in January 2020. This programme has a combined budget of €27 million and is funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research in the Gravitation funding scheme for excellent research, and by matching funds from the participating institutions. The programme has the aim of achieving breakthrough research at the intersection of ethics, philosophy, technology/engineering and social sciences, and to position its consortium at the top of its field internationally. A key objective is to investigate how new technologies challenge moral values and ontological concepts (like “nature”, “human being” and “community”), and how these challenges necessitate a revision of these concepts. The programme includes four research lines, “Nature, Life and Human Intervention”, “The Future of a Free and Fair Society”, “The Human Condition” and “Foundations & Synthesis: Ethics of Technology, Practical Philosophy, and Modern Technology-Driven Societies”.
This position is situated within the research line “Foundations & Synthesis.” You will work under the supervision of
Joel Anderson and
Jeroen Hopster, and in collaboration with other researchers from the ESDiT programme. You are expected to play an active role in the project described above and to participate actively in the workshops, public events, courses and other activities of the Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies programme in general and the “Foundations & Synthesis” research line in particular. You will also play a pivotal role regarding ESDiT’s objective to strengthen mutually beneficial dialogues between researchers working in ethical theory and those working in ethics of technology. The position is based at
the Ethics Institute, which is part of the department of Philosophy and Religious Studies of Utrecht University. It provides a stimulating and internationally oriented research environment. This is primarily a research appointment, focused on research publications, although you may be expected to devote up to 10% of worktime to teaching or to other non-research activities related to the ESDiT programme.