Job Description Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds immense potential in revolutionizing various sectors, notably healthcare. However, distrust surrounding AI, particularly in healthcare settings, poses significant challenges for all stakeholders involved, including doctors and patients. The lack of trust likely stems from uncertainties around AI's competence, honesty, and reliability, especially in epistemically and politically opaque AI models like deep learning.
The AI-TRUST project aims to investigate the trustworthiness of AI systems in healthcare. This empirical interdisciplinary project combines insights from sociology of science, philosophy of technology, and AI research to understand how primary stakeholders, such as healthcare professionals and patients, evaluate the trustworthiness of AI systems. The research will also explore the redistributions of expertise and power associated with the adoption and adaption of AI in healthcare.
To accomplish these goals, you will identify and engage with stakeholders, collect data in the clinical and research practices in which AI features and conduct experiments with these actors. The project embodies innovative and participative approaches, rooted in sociological and philosophical perspectives on trustworthiness and credibility.
Your responsibility is to fulfill all the requirements to obtain a PhD degree at Maastricht University, including but not limited to:
- Write and co-write academic publications which will form the basis of your PhD thesis, together with the members of your supervision team and others,
- Collect data according to a well-considered research design,
- Further build your qualitative and mixed-methods data analysis skills,
- Participate in required and jointly decided elements of your PhD education
You will be working in and with two interdisciplinary groups: Clinical Data Science (CDS) and Health, Ethics & Society (HES), both in the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML). You will be expected to actively participate in the colloquia and meeting of both groups and will benefit from peers with expertises in quantitative and qualitative methodology, descriptive and normative studies and experimental and theoretical foci. At any given moment, your reliance on one of these groups and their expertise may take priority, but for the whole duration of the work we expect this to be balanced.